A note to my friends and contacts in the UK
Don't leave me stranded on the Continent...!
If there have been any verifiable facts in the debate over Britain's referendum to stay in or to leave Europe to its own devices, I missed them. It's all (up to the lamentable murder of Jo Cox, MP) been an ever more unedifying and frankly embarrassing spectacle of bellowings, bawlings and balderdash ratcheting down to the lowest common denominator red-herrings of immigration and outliers on the EU regulations spectrum.So I can't and won't base my thoughts on any clear factual basis. What remain are feelings and conscience, which crystallise in and out as I change perspective. But whatever the perspective, my feelings and conscience compel me to ask you to vote "Remain", if only on the basis that I don't want my life made even more complicated than it already is.
About me and my European friends
I live and work in Germany. Nope, not in "Europe", but in Germany. Equally, an Italian friend of mine in Heidelberg didn't move from Europe to Europe for work - he's as Italian as he ever was, perhaps even more so now he's surrounded by barbarians. It's the old discussion I remember having at school, but sometimes it's totally worth remembering that Europe is as diverse as it ever has been, but thanks to 'Europe' our countries no longer have to go to war amongst themselves to express this diversity.
My Perspectives
Me being me, I can only describe some of my ways of looking at the whole theme of Europe. Your opinions and perspectives may diverge from mine. That's great! (just vote Remain, OK?)The automotive business perspective
I work as an engineer in the automotive business - emphatically not as a vegetable-straightness worrier (or engine emissions regulator) in Brussels - and to me It doesn't get much clearer than this: Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Jaguar Land Rover and hundreds of suppliers don't want suddenly to be not in Europe. I'm guessing most other industries think similarly.
I've seen talk that the UK would balance additional customs charges with Europe with the freedom to individually negotiate import duties with other global trading partners. But doesn't having a strong negotiating position somewhat depend on being large? There aren't many trading partners larger than the European Union. The EU is notoriously split inwardly on many issues and can never seem to give a straight answer: that's true and pertinent to the discussion - but is the United Kingdom of {England, Wales, Scotland} and Northern Ireland significantly more coherent than the EU?
What about other non-EU countries? Switzerland? Japan? South Korea? They're doing OK, aren't they? That's true, and perhaps there are potential models for an "independent" Britain to look at: but we can do that from within the context of the EU (whose regulations we still have to meet in order to trade), especially as Britain still has the flexibility of Sterling (which is another theme altogether).
The engineer's perspective
Have there been any testable and disprovable theories in all of these discussions? No, and I accept that it would be unreasonable for us to expect too much of what is such a messily human, emotive, political theme. But an engineer should remain alert to the differences between a sub-optimal actuality and a much-improved dream.When we work on developing next-generation products, we create our theories, our models, our prototypes - and we test the hell out of them to discover their limits, to prove (or disprove) that their implementation would indeed result in a better world than what we have at present. Until then, we stick to what we know and have validated.
What the Brexit campaigners seem to be doing is asking a whole union of disparate countries, regions and cultures (yes, that's Britain I'm talking about) to leap into a dream scenario that can't be modelled, simluated or trialled in advance.
The engineer's way would be to build a smaller island just off the UK (like the now-famous Guernsey, for example), and exit that first, to test the waters. But I doubt the Johnsons or Farages of this world would have the patience or the funding for anything as long-term as that.
Wasn't it the same when Britain entered the EU? An unknowable quantity? In one sense, yes, but Britain stood before two equally unsure paths: joining a new, peacable and ideologically appealing community, or staying away whilst the Empire crumbled. The benefits of joining the EU look to have been palpably clearer than of staying away. But perhaps Edward Heath and his government were wrong in 1973 whilst Boris Johnson et al are simply right... right?
A family man's perspective
I'm happy for my children to have British nationality and German passports, but my wife and I are mono-nationalities. I'm also very much in the lower quartile of the population when it comes to acceptance of bureaucracy - so for that reason, and because I don't want to be forced to apply for German nationality or to have to plod through ever increasingly baroque and rococo bureaucratic mazes just to stay where I am, thank you very much.A European sceptic's perspective
The biggie with the EU is the democratic deficit. Did we vote for Donald Tusk and Herman van Rompuy? Oh, and I mentioned the word deficit, which has overwhelmingly ecomonic overtones. How badly has (whatever Europe actually is) handled the economic crisis, become overly sensitive to the proclivities of German voters? How embarrassing has the infighting over Syrian refugees been...?Wouldn't it be great to just say "stuff it" and to leave them to this monstrosity of a mess they've gotten themselves into? I can accept that that's a tempting thought - and a key reason for British governments to stumble time after time over this uneven, barely traversable terrain. Equally, I can see there having been a compelling reason for David Cameron to push to issue to the level it has reached now: similar to the Scottish referendum, it should be a once-in-a-generation "clear the air" initiative. I just wonder if Cameron realised how close this would come to being a severe miscalculation